Posts Tagged ‘independents’

madness of the musical variety, in march

Sunday, March 8th, 2009

KUMM hosted a concert this past Friday called March Music Madness. Three bands played. First was Cathy Crescendo, second was Kristoff Krane, and third was His Mischief.

Cathy Crescendo was good, they played well as a group, but all of their songs sort of sounded the same, and had a little bit too much emo-pop feel to them. I don’t know. The main female singer had an amazing voice, and when she and the lead male singer sang in harmony, I thought it sounded really cool. When the main male singer was singing by himself, it left a bit to be desired. Overall, they put on a decent show.

Kristoff Krane, on the other hand, was a completely different experience. He deems himself ‘experimental hip-hop’, and it really definitely was. There was no standard fast yelling, the tracks he was rapping to had some non-standard sounding instruments (horns, woodwinds), and it wasn’t all rap. He had some pieces where there was a almost a call and answer, between the rapper and the singer (both parts done by him).

The thing that interested me the most about Kris was the unorthodox way he performed. He was all about feeling, and what the audience was into. He forgot his effects pedal, and was incredibly apologetic about it. It seemed as though he was really worried about it. That said, he did this really cool section where he engaged the audience, and really just ended up having everyone humming for about 3 minutes. It was completely unplanned, seemingly, but still kinda cool. He seemed really happy by it, and I thought it was cool that there was that level of interaction with the audience. He’s a pretty deep guy, and was the artist that I felt like I connected the most with, both musically and personally.

His Mischief was probably the most professional (in the traditional sense of the word), and the most well put together band. They seemed like they were used to playing shows, used to playing their set, and used to the whole ‘concert’ thing. They didn’t seem like they had a real stage presence, except when they were playing. I was not engaged at all by their stage presence, and I was not a big fan of their music. That said, they were good musicians, what they were playing I was not into at all.

Maybe there’s something I’m missing, maybe I’m too picky, or maybe I’m just too much of a hippie to be into the whole ’standard’ music thing. Kristoff Krane was, in my opinion, by far the best artist of the night.

Makes me wanna start writing lyrics again (for real this time).

Second presidential debate was last night

Wednesday, October 8th, 2008

I’m sure there are hundreds, if not thousands of blog posts about the presidential debate last night, so this is nothing new.

First, I’d like to say that I felt Obama did a much better job overall. He was more engaged with the audience, despite the fact that Town Hall format is supposed to be McCain’s strong suit.

Both candidates kept hitting on drilling and clean coal, which seemed to be Obama’s way of pandering to conservatives. Obama has consistently said that he’d prefer alternative energy sources, a sort of “green revolution” similar to the way the computer revolutionized our economy in the recent past. This position I was much more a fan of than his new “let’s consider drilling, clean coal, nuclear, as an interim to the green revolution I was talking about before. The moderator asked a question something along the lines of

Do you think the “green revolution” should be started by the government, or left to be developed in people’s garages?

People’s garages? You mean like the way Google got started? Two young grad students who had an idea, and ran a server out of their garage in order to make it happen?

The government? You mean the same way the internet originally started as a DARPA project, and as a result, the United States still controls all off the root DNS servers?

Another thing that bugged me was the interviewing of the “undecided ohio voters” at the end of CNN’s coverage. In concept, I think it’s a sort of cool idea. I sort of like hearing what undecided voters are thinking about. However, last night, the “undecided voters” kept saying “I kept hearing more of the same from both candidates, and I didn’t like that”.

Ok, first of all, these are political candidates, who are vying for the presidency. To a certain extent, they have to be canned, and have to not be too radical, or there’s no way they’d win. Second, it’s really really late in the race for either of them to be drastically changing their platform’s talking points. You don’t want to hear “more of the same”, but if they start changing what they’re saying they’re gonna be accused of flip-flopping, or waffling (I love metaphors in election discussions). Furthermore, would you really like Obama better if he had said last night “No, I’ve changed my mind. I hate the gays, regulation is a bad thing, oh, and while I’m at it, I’m a muslim with ties to a domestic terrorist. Ayers and I are best friends!” ?

Their platforms are what set them apart from each other, and if either of them change, there’s not much other range on the issues that they could go, beyond into the realm of where their opponent is.

So, undecided voters. First, stop trying to be all “fair and balanced” or “idealistic” or whatever. If you want to vote idealistic, vote for a third party candidate. I’m considering it, but I know that the system isn’t going to change by my doing so, and that furthermore, I might as well throw my vote away. Understand that these are your two options, understand that they’ve both pretty much fleshed out their platforms throughout the course of the campaign. Yes, I know neither of them has given wonderful answers regarding the economy, but I don’t think anyone can at this moment. You may not agree whole-heartedly with either candidate (I know I sure as hell don’t), but pick the one you tend to agree with more, and make a decision. These debates aren’t going to help you make your decision, because neither candidate will be saying anything beyond what they’ve already said (except for maybe Palin, but she hasn’t said anything, ever).

-JTS